 |
|  |
|
Spokane anarchist sentenced to probation
|
|
SPOKANE, Wash. -- A self-described anarchist who broke windows at
military recruiting offices in Spokane to voice his opposition to the
war in Iraq was placed on three years probation and ordered to pay
$4,867 in restitution.
Travis Riehl pleaded guilty in March to a felony count of
destruction of government property, and was only expected to be placed
on one year probation under terms of a written plea agreement. But U.S.
District Court Judge Robert Whaley gave him a stiffer sentence to get
Riehl's attention and push him into more productive activities.
The 24-year-old activist has been involved with groups such as
Spokane Lack of Action Collective and Alternative Solutions and
Possibilities.
|
Posted by Jedite83 on Monday, June 23 @ 02:43:36 EDT (7 reads)
(comments? | Score: 0)
|
|
From Southern Studies - by Sue Sturgis
Beside the bullying behavior of Big Energy, another troubling aspect
of the story about environmental activist Panagioti Tsolkas' spirited
fight against Florida Power & Light's expansion plans has been the
media coverage.
Writing last week for the Palm Beach Post's "Seeing Green" blog, for
example, reporter Christine Stapleton called Tsolkas a "self-described
anarchist." She also deployed the "anarchist" label in the post's
headline.
Now, could you imagine a Big Media reporter calling the CEO of a Big
Energy company a "self-described capitalist"? Or the director of a Big
Green organization a "self-described social democrat"?
What's the rhetorical purpose of a designation like "self-described
anarchist"? To let readers know they shouldn't take the activist's
ideas seriously because he inhabits the political "fringe" -- even
though some of the United States' most prominent intellectuals inhabit
that same "fringe"?
|
|
St. Paul and cops gear up for worst at GOP convention
|
|
But protesters say the threat is being hyped to prevent them from exercising their free speech.
Suicide bombers. Chemical or biological attacks. Lone gunmen.
Terrorist attacks. Riots. Blockades that could shut down the Republican
National Convention.
In its most explicit arguments to date, the St. Paul city attorney's
office on Friday outlined the "calamitous" potential of granting a
request by antiwar demonstrators to change the route and time of a
Sept. 1 march outside the Xcel Energy Center.
Protest organizers accused the city of scare tactics designed to legitimize the denial of free speech.
The dire warnings by the city came in a legal brief it filed to
support the permit restrictions it is placing on the antiwar group.
The city warned of "immeasurable risks to public safety and
security" if protesters were allowed a march route that could total
100,000 and encircle the Xcel, site of the Sept. 1-4 convention.
At the Minneapolis offices of the Coalition to March on the RNC and
Stop the War, Jessica Sundin, one of the group's leaders, accused
authorities of exaggerating the threats.
"There are no experiences in recent history of conventions being
targeted by the kind of violence they are describing in their brief,"
said Sundin, who has taken a leave from her clerical job at the
University of Minnesota.
"They are raising a specter of terrorism that is absolutely
unfounded, and they are using it to prevent us from speaking out
against terrorism being inflicted on the Iraqi people every day by U.S.
occupation forces," said Sundin, who took the leave to work on the
protest.
Prolonged dispute
St. Paul officials and the protesters have been engaged in a
prolonged dispute over when a permit for the march would be issued and,
lately, over details of the permit.
In mid-May, police granted a permit that allows demonstrators to march to the Xcel from the State Capitol and back.
Attorneys for the American Civil Liberties U.nion of Minnesota and
the National Lawyers Guild filed briefs this month saying the march
route is too narrow, the turn-around too abrupt, and the noon-to-2 p.m.
period allowed for the demonstration too early in the day, occurring
before convention delegates arrive at the center.
A hearing on the matter is scheduled for July 9 before U.S. District Judge Joan Ericksen.
City officials have repeatedly said that they welcome nonviolent
protesters and that they have gone out of their way to accommodate the
free speech concerns of dissenters. The projected size of the antiwar
demonstration on the first day has been estimated at between 50,000 and
100,000, although there has been some speculation it could be smaller,
depending on the situation in Iraq.
While St. Paul Assistant Police Chief Matt Bostrom previously has
made references to potential threats, such as the detonation of a bomb,
or blockades by anarchist groups, Friday's court filing was the most
detailed description about concerns of law enforcement.
Included with the brief is a memorandum from John A. Kolerno, the
Secret Service coordinator for the convention, who noted that attendees
typically include a range of high- ranking officials.
"In planning security measures for the RNC," Kolerno wrote, "the
Secret Service is considering a wide array of potential security
threats, including terrorist attacks, lone gunmen, fire, environmental
hazards, chemical or biological attacks, structural safety concerns,
and suicide bombers."
In a separate memorandum, Bostrom warned that "certain groups and
persons have specifically and publicly stated their intent to 'shut
down the RNC' by denying delegate access to the Xcel Energy Center."
He cited a "self-described anarchist/anti-authoritarian" group known
as the RNC Welcoming Committee, which has advocated a "three-tier
strategy" of blocking the Xcel Center, "immobilizing" delegates'
transportation and blocking connecting bridges.
Seattle riots cited
He referred to "violent riots" that occurred in Seattle in 1999,
when he said the city failed to heed threats to shut down meetings of
the World Trade Organization. And he said St. Paul needed to have
unimpeded traffic flow for emergency vehicles to get to and from the
Xcel Center, if necessary.
|
Posted by Jedite83 on Monday, June 23 @ 02:41:36 EDT (9 reads)
(comments? | Score: 0)
|
|
|
For Revolutionary Struggle... Not Activism
|
|
From Imminient Rebellion - by Asher
“We need more people!” ---- “If only there were more anarchists...”
---- These phrases and others like them are all too common amongst our
anarchist ommunities across Aotearoa (and no doubt the rest of the
world). But in themselves, they betray a fatal mistake in our goals, in
how we see our role in moving towards a revolutionary situation.
An anarchist revolution will not come if we simply seek to convert
more people to anarchism. Rather, more people adopting anarchist theory
will be a by-product of successful anarchist organising and solidarity.
There are a few issues we need to examine in order to best understand
the role of anarchists in capitalist society. Who will make a
revolution?
An anarchist revolution cannot be made by a vanguard, by an elite
group of activists, politicos or anarchists. A truly libertarian
revolution, which all anarchists seek, can only be made by the great
mass of the working class, in a broad sense of the term. This
revolution will not magically appear the day we manage to get 51% of
the population to call themselves anarchists, but rather by constantly
seeking to expand upon the consciousness and militancy of the working
class.
|
|
anarchists attack wells fargo in tacoma, wa
|
|
some time last night wells fargo was attacked
from two sides and had many of their windows smashed. the message "stop
prisons" was spray painted on one side of the building. this was done
due to wells fargo being one of the top share holders of geo group. geo
group is responsible for the operations of many prisons, juvinile
detention centers, and imigration detention centers. including one in
guantanamo bay, Cuba. geo group operates the I.C.E detention center in
tacoma, washington. this detention center imprisons up to 1000 people
any givin day and has locked people their, away from their families and
friends, often times far exceading 3 years. this action is in
solidarity with all struggle against deportation and the displacement
of human beings internationaly. this is in solidarity with the simular
attacks on wells fargo in portland, oregon. this is just one way of
many to resist these intitutions that wish to control our freedom to
move. obviously this is not the only way. as more walls go up, as more
detention centers are built, reistance of all sorts will be needed in
defeating these monsters.
for a world with no borders!
for a world with no walls!
for a world with no prisons!
for a world absent of eploitation!
for a world of life!
for anarchy!
-anarchists
|
Posted by Jedite83 on Friday, June 13 @ 12:21:38 EDT (17 reads)
(comments? | Score: 0)
|
|
|  |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
|
|
|
|